Not long ago - while Clinton and Obama were engaged in their fight-to-the death cage match - John McCain gloried in the reflected glow of the media. He gave them unprecedented access and asked the boys on the bus over for a little BBQ and beer to seal the deal. In return, he got good press. In new ads, out today, McC carps about the O-Man getting all the props now.
An astonishing reversal of fortune? Not so much. While one would hope adult professionals aren’t swayed by some pulled pork on a bun, I’m sure it happens. But the question of access and actions has a little more to do with it than a cold, Belgian-owned Bud and the secret family sauce.
McCain’s original open access was a good deal for everyone, but it was a reckless campaign move. McCain is a man not unlike Dub. He’s prone to verbal gaffes when he holds forth at the back of the Fork-Tongued Express. He’s even deadlier in front of a crowd making a formal speech. His campaign banked that what they call his “authenticity” would carry the day. But the gamble didn’t work.
Team Obama did a couple of things to bring the media over to his side. He finished his bruising primary run and moved quickly to heal his accumulated bumps, cuts, and bruises. Meanwhile, Mr. McCainiac wasted the advantage by, well, giving BBQs and drinking beer. He still talked plenty on the bus, but issued few new policy positions and was boringly slow to respond to questions and issues. If there’s one thing that’s sure death to the media, it’s boredom. “Authentic” jokes about rape to the contrary, an average day with McCain is about as interesting as watching some sandy, cactus-ridden Arizona scrub land.
The other thing Obama did was to learn a lesson from ol’ Johnny - and then reversing it. He tightened his restrictions on the media. He only talked on a grand scale to throngs more akin to Sunday afternoons at the football game than whistlestops - and he did it well. Every event was carefully staged and he made policy talks that - if not exactly trailblazing - were at least not boring. Obama handled problems better too. He managed to turn the Rev. Wright debacle into a plus and has shrugged off other bad news fairly readily. McCain never has gotten rid of his reputation as a lobbyist magnet and still wrestles with his own pastor problem. It boiled down to trying to cozy up to the press vs. running a tight media ship where the candidate controls the news cycle.
Those on both sides complain about the media and many of those complaints are merited, but this is one of those times when the campaigns themselves carried more weight than the personal choices of Big Media mavens. When a candidate lives and dies by press clippings they have to learn how to play the game. I expect media coverage will shift many more times as this interminable campaign goes on. John will eventually learn how to do it at least as well as learning how to get his email. Obie will inevitably step in some cowpie and take his licking. Alliances will change, mistakes will be made, there will be tiffs and outrageous charges the media is more than happy to report. It’s a dance as old as politics itself. It’s like my Dad used to say, “It doesn’t matter if someone’s right or wrong, it only matters who has the best line of shite.”
John McCain can’t catch a break from the New York Times these days. The Times rejected his recent equal time op-ed piece in response to an Obama piece run last week. There’s nothing particular noteworthy about that, media outlets rejecting equal time requests are common now that the old mandatory equal time rules have gone by the wayside. Besides, you could hardly call the NYT editorial board hardcore McCainiacs. But the reason given for the rejection was a little different.
Amongst several other demands, the NYT said that Mr. McCainiac’s article,”would have to articulate, in concrete terms, how Senator McCain defines victory in Iraq. It would also have to lay out a clear plan for achieving victory - with troops levels, timetables and measures for compelling the Iraqis to cooperate. And it would need to describe the senator’s Afghanistan strategy, spelling out how it meshes with his Iraq plan.”
What Does ‘Victory’ Mean Exactly
Obama’s article appeared to contain some of that information, but also seems short of that lofty goal. In fact, it’d be tough for any candidate to offer that much specificity on a very complex issue in a single op-ed article. Having said that, I’d sure like to see it - even in condensed form. We’re 7 years into this mess and nothing is any clearer than when we’d been there for 7 days. I’ve yet to hear the working definition of “victory” and no information about plans other than, “trust us, we know what we’re doing” - a hard position to argue when the administration continues to claim that any information will immediately allow the terrorists will “win”.
I can understand that newsprint isn’t cheap and that papers want their articles to be fresh and contain information people haven’t seen before. I can also see why they’d not like to have their prominent editorial page turned into a broadsheet campaign flyer. The Times says they often negotiate with op-ed contributors about what they will and won’t accept and they claim that’s the case here. On the other hand, campaigns understandably bristle at the restrictions and often use the opportunity to charge bias against a media outlet. It’s unclear if that’s the case here, although Team Walnuts hasn’t specifically charged that. The muck is further raked up when you look at the history between the two. The NYT endorsed McCain early on, but later was the first to break the story about McCain’s possibly overly close relationship with a female lobbyist. In other words, they have a love/hate thing goin’ on.
It’s been a long time since my last anger-filled screed. This unexpected development isn’t because there are no more topics worthy of long and vicious screeds, it’s because I’m feeling a little like a ripple wimpily expending itself on the placid shores of a pond. It’s hard to get all worked up when the crapstorms fly at you faster than a thick swarm of killer bees stinging the ass of a nudist. So, it’s time to apply a little WD-40 to the snarky joints and get back in the swing of things.
Be kind, I’m rusty.
Not everything that happens to Barak Obama is about racism.
Not everything that happens to John McCain is about being a war hero.
Not everything that happens to Hillary Clinton is about sexism.
“Experience” has little to do with all three.
“Experience” has even less to do with Emperor Asshat’s crapulent performance either.