Curse You Father for You Have Sinned

Font Size » Large | Small


It's All Your Fault

THE SEXY LITTLE SCAMP DID IT! - The Vatican and it's apologists are doing everything possible to blame someone else for rampant sex abuse by priests. What's next, blame the victim?

Catholic League President and Vatican apologist, Bill Donohue, has stepped into the church’s molestation scandal to make things worse, as if they weren’t bad enough already. With the Pope’s mitre caught in the wringer, Donohue took a page from the Karl Rove political playbook – blame everyone except yourself. Catholicism has officially become a “no fault” religion.

Donohue’s “logic” about responsibility for the crisis is tortured at best. He starts the finger pointing with the New York Times (why is it always the media’s fault) for calling the mess a “pedophilia” crisis. His implied logic is that most of the victims were post-pubescent. Does he believe it’s somehow less of a sin to molest someone who shaves regularly than to play grab ass with a kid who’s still in elementary school? I’m sure all those victims, including the post-pubescent kids and adults who were molested, will be greatly relieved to find out they weren’t “abused” after all.

Oops, our bad Mr. Pope sir,” they’ll surely say. “Now that Mr. Donohue has explained it, I guess it wasn’t molestation at all. Father Damian just took off my clothes and read me Bible stories. The sodomy afterwards was just his way of saying AMEN.”

But the New York Times and post-pubescent kids aren’t the only bad guys. As with many things in society, the gays are also at fault. “While homosexuality does not cause predatory behavior, and most gay priests are not molesters, most of the molesters have been gay,” he said.

Huh?

So, if being gay isn’t a sign of predatory behavior, why is it important that most of the molesters – or predators as he calls them – have been gay? I’m not seeing the fine distinction between a run of the mill “molester” and a “molester” who “preys” upon victims.

Priests Gone Wild

The only thing missing are the Mardi Gras beads.

Furthermore, the Catholic Church considers homosexuality a sin. If priests – supposedly good role models for the people they minister – are committing sins, why would Ratzie continue to let them represent the church? If a priest denounced the Pope as an ugly, dangerous crapweasel with flamboyant fashion sense, I’m guessing there would be, pardon me, hell to pay…although, I would reward him for his honesty.

In fact, why is the Catholic Church investigating itself at all? Child molestation – or rape for the over-puberty set – is against the law. Why are the molesters being protected and aren’t those protectors guilty of conspiracy? If secular police aren’t going to enforce these crimes, are they going to ignore someone who kills a parishioner during morning mass?

Donohue’s explanations are about as logical as Creationism. If anyone is guilty of a sin, Donohue, the Pope, and his personal ring-kissers are right up there with the molesters. So riddle me this, if homosexuals aren’t predators, but can be molesters, couldn’t grown men dressed in white muumuus, dripping gaudy jewelry, and wearing funny red hats be called homosexuals – especially when they show all the self-loathing homophobia common in closeted homosexuals?

“Curse you Father for you have sinned.”

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

11 thoughts on “Curse You Father for You Have Sinned

  1. Pingback: Traduire RSS

  2. How did Bush and Obama get dragged into this discussion? Is everything either Bush’s fault, Obama’s fault or both? Sheesh!

  3. “If secular police aren’t going to enforce these crimes, are they going to ignore someone who kills a parishioner during morning mass?”

    Is that person a Catholic? Or, better yet, a priest?

  4. Now there’s the nub of it.

    And everyone knows the answer.

    Thanks for concisive reporting. May I blogroll you?

    S

    In fact, why is the Catholic Church investigating itself at all? Child molestation – or rape for the over-puberty set – is against the law. Why are the molesters being protected and aren’t those protectors guilty of conspiracy? If secular police aren’t going to enforce these crimes, are they going to ignore someone who kills a parishioner during morning mass?

  5. Vic,
    I’m not sure what any of this has to do with political administrations, but if you can make that leap, I’ll not argue.

    I don’t like everything Obama has done – truth be told, I’m not too enthusiastic about him at all – but he’s a long stretch from the sort of fascism or communism you imply.

    BTW, if you are one of those people who use communism and fascism interchangably, please note your dictionary. Neither are necesssarily totalitarian and one is the opposite of the other. If you don’t use them improperly, except to the extent you puff their meanings up more than reality suggests, my apologies.

    BTW, you’re not an ex-catholic are you?

  6. Why should the BushCo-dependent church be any different than the NAPPY (No Account President and Party of Yoo) it cohabitates? After all, BS (Bush Shadow) Obamanible’s reneged on every promise made, turning the dreams of his father into the nightmares of full frontal fascism of the Fatherland for US all! Yes, He HAS!!

  7. Pingback: www.buzzflash.net

Give Us Some Choice Words